Saturday, December 31, 2011

Those who forget the lessons of history....

Rant

I was there watching the election when Sarath Fonseka ran for president and lost. And then the Army surrounded the Galadari Hotel where he was waiting.


Of course no one came to his rescue. No one protested like they did in Iran against Ahmadinejad or in Russia against Putin. There was no mass upswelling of protest and anger.


Because very few people actually voted for Sarath Fonseka. Most of the votes were against Mahinda Rajapaksa - aka The Beast. Even YT who swore that he was going to spoil his vote because he felt neither candidate was worthy of his vote, ended up voting against The Beast because of the multiple showings of The Rise and Fall of Idi Amin on state TV. People voted for Fonseka because he was the not-rajapaksa.


Now everyone is trying to make a martyr of SF - forgetting, of course, that to become a martyr, you have to be martyred. They scream and shout that this is revenge (of course it is) and a frame up (would you expect any less from The Beast).


There are many petitions to free SF. There is even an attempt to liken him to Nelson Mandela. Nelson fucking Mandela.. I fucking swear. They even petitioned the White House, and there was much cheering and cries of "Jayawewa" because if they made 25,000 signatures the US Government would make representations to The Beast. Only thing is... they won't.


And of course The Beast himself has stated that he won't listen to the USGOV anyway. But, if the pardon plea came from the family (no doubt with much prostration and feet kissery - also dick sucking) he would "consider" it.


After all, why should he listen to the US? And why should the USGOV intervene? After all, it was the same people who now scream and beg for help and justice from the other countries that protested against and blocked any form of international intervention in the Sri Lankan Civil War. The same ones who claimed that other countries had "no right" to intervene in what was an "internal matter".


They were the same ones who were cheering that Sri Lanka finally had a "worthy leader" who had the balls to stand up to the "neocolonial powers". They were the ones who stood by The Beast while he trampled on the rights of the people. They screamed their support while he shut down and killed those who stood up to him. They convinced the Rajapaksa Brothers that they can do whatever they wanted with impunity.


And now the retards who supported all the bullshit, who screamed loudly that anyone who dared to question the "glorious leader" were traitors to the race and nation, who didn't see the whirlwind they would soon be reaping. Now those idiots are screaming to the very people they chased off and vilified for help.


First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.

So reap the whirlwind, bitches. Reap it!

Monday, December 05, 2011

What is love?

Muse

A long time ago my FEW called me a robot. She said that I had no emotions. That I didn't feel.


I, of course, took that as a compliment.


I have always valued rationality over emotions. Mr. Spock was my hero. Even to this day I would rather solve problems through rational discourse rather than screaming and shouting.


But that doesn't seem to work too well with women.


Women want me to make an emotional commitment to them. And I find this is something I just cannot do.


I can't seem to lose control. I can't seem to want to give up everything. to fight dragons, to say, "Fuck it. I will do this because I love this woman."


I can't seem to lose or give up emotional control.


It wasn't always this way of course.


In my younger days I had no problems in doing that. I would give my all for a woman. I was willing to do anything, make any changes to myself and my lifestyle to be with someone. But as I grew older, that changed.


I guess the big change was somewhere in 2001. A bad breakup in 2000, followed by an even worse one in 2002, which led to depression and an attempt at suicide where I learned that 24 tabs of Panadol are not enough to kill you, just give you bad heartburn.


Since then I have been uable to feel anything romantic for anyone. There is no rush of emotion.


I find it impossible to get that can't-eat, can't- sleep, reach-for-the-stars, over-the-fence, World Series kind of stuff.


I sometimes envy those who can. I envy those who can actually feel something. Those whose wires haven't been overloaded and burnt out. Those who can unconditionally love someone. And feel pain when it is going wrong.


As my friend the Toymaker asked me once, Would you rather be unhappy with her, or happy without her?


Apparently my answering - without any thought or hesitation - that I would rather be happy, meant that I was not in love.


This is not to say that I don't care for, or even love the women in my life. It means that I am unable to get that deep emotional bond that many of the women in my life seem to want. I even find it difficult to say I love you to someone. Something that I was able to do before my marriage.


But that doesn't mean that I don't care. That I don't miss them when they leave - or to be more accurate, when I drive them away. It doesn't mean that I feel sad that they are no longer in my life.


It just means that I shrug, and move on.

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Paying for Petrol

Muse

The hot news is that the LKGOV is compensating people for engine damages caused by the substandard petrol that was imported by the Ceypetco.


Now at face value this sounds like an excellent idea. After all, it is only fair that the people who fucked up your car engine pay for the damage they caused.


But who's paying for it really?


They say that they will pay compensation up to LKR50,000 for the affected vehicles. And over 2,000 vehicles have claimed damages, for a total of LKR100,000,000 in compensation.


Of course that isn't much. About LKR 20 from every man, woman, and child in Sri Lanka. And a lot cheaper than buying a Russian helicopter.


But it is the principle of the thing isn't it?


The money for compensation is coming from Ceypetco. Which means that it will be added to the price of fuel. So a few mililiters of every liter of petrol you pump into your car will go to pay for the compensation. And yet, the people who were responsible for this debacle are not only going to get off scot free, but they will be rewarded for it in the form of whatever cuts and commissions they got from it.


This is not new. This is not a unique situation. This is the status quo in Sri Lanka. Zero accountability. And whatever compensation will be paid by taxes by the state. And life - and the activities - will go on as if nothing had happened.


And that is the rub isn't it?

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Buddha for power

Muse

Or is it vice-versa? I forget.

So Sri Lankan - and perhaps the world - has its first Mayor Monk. Not only did he run for power, but when he was elected he held a temper tantrum fast because The Beast said he couldn't be mayor because he was - you know - a monk. One of those people who have stepped away from lay life for a life of seeking enlightenment.

Monks joining the monkeys in parliament is nothing new. We have had them since 2004. They even got into fights in parliament.

But talking about that is another blog post.

I'm here to talk about Wewelduwe Gnanaprabha who screamed, and shouted, and stamped his feet, and held his breath refused to eat until he was given the position of Mayor of Embilipitiya.

You see.. this is a Good Thing™.

"But wait!" I hear you yell.

"What about your 'separation of church and state' stance? Does this mean that you have 'evolved on it?"

Nay, True Believer. YT has not changed at all (in fact YT is still wearing the same shorts from a week ago).

You see, the reason why The Beast - in a fit of sanity? or just because even a broken clock can be correct twice a day? - initially refused Gnana (not the be confused with Nana, the purveyor of spicy meaty goodness at Galle Face Green) the post of Mayor is because as Mayor, he would have to approve of things that are (nominally at least) antithetical to Buddhism.

Things like Liquor Licences. Meat Licences. Gambling Licences. You know.. the good things in life. (although we're still waiting for the whoring licence)

Now the thing is, people love their vices. And Embilipitiya is no exception. Moonshine, venison, and - YT is told - some of the best local ganja comes from the area.

So there are three paths that this situation can take.

  1. Stop issuing meat, liquor, and gambling licences

    This would make him MIGHTY popular with the people.

    Of course there will be people who benefit from this. Frozen meats don't need a licence, so your Food City, Keels Super, and regular shop owner don't need to worry. But considering that meat shops sell fresher meat for half the price, the consumer definitely will.

    And then there is alcohol. Make alcohol illegal and you create a thriving kasippu (moonshine) industry. And considering that moonshine was ostensibly made illegal because of the chance that improper distillation would lead to methanol poisoning (the fact that they were not paying heavy extortions to the government had nothing to do with it. Nope. Nothing at all) the people who would suffer would be the Common Man™.

    And of course the gambling ban will not affect the sale of lottery tickets at all. After all, if the Government does - nay promotes it, it's not gambling is it?

    So IF Gnana decides that he is not going to sign any of those horrible things that undermine the virtuous nation, then when the next election rolls along, there would be a massive influx of money the candidate - any candidate - that promises, even in private, to bring back the licensing.

    And because people love their morality at arm's length, the eating, drinking, gambling people of Embilipitiya would vote for them.

  2. Let his secretary sign them

    "I wash my hands of it," said Pontius Pilate.

    Gnana may not be able/willing to sign the licences, but he could always tell his secretary to sign them.

    But that would lead to other problems. First off, can the Secretary sign them? Is it even legal? Secondly, since these licences are the most lucrative income generators for whoever signs them, the Secretary is going to become rich. Very rich. And rich means powerful. And also means possibly able to stand for candidate at the next election. See above.

  3. Sign the damned things

    The simplest thing. And yet one that would get him flack from every direction. The people in his electorate would not be happy that he reneged on his holy vows for politics. They would not be happy that he got off the "morality" soapbox that he came to power on. And when the next election happens, this would be the first thing brought out against him.

Religion and morality in politics is a strange thing. It only works in the abstract.

Any politician who promises to make a moral law legal will be voted into power. As long as that law is not enforced too strictly. Bring in Prohibition, but don't look too hard at what is being sold under the counter. Make abortions illegal, but don't look too hard at that clinic.

Morality works best when it applies to your neighbour, not to you.

So the JHU is approved of when it gets into Parliament and screams and shouts and passes laws that affect no one directly. But when a robe-wearer gets into the local government and then starts messing with people directly, then there will be a problem.

What I hope will happen is that the people will get tired of this robe-wearer in particular and of robe-wearers in politics in general and refuse to vote them back in. That there will be a societal backlash against all this, and the creation of a SinBud Taliban will be forestalled.

What is more likely is that there will be more and more busy-bodies pushing robe-wearers into power because, it is their moral imperative to stop you doing what you want.H. L. Mencken defined puritanism as the haunting fear that someone, somewhere is having a good time. And we DO have a large number or Puritans in Sri Lanka (starting with The Beast himself) who want to stop other people from having fun, as long as THEY can do it.

And We The People will just sit with our thumbs up our collective asses, and do nothing about it.

That's what we always do.

Monday, August 29, 2011

A Blast From The Past: Time to give up on Sri Lanka

Rant

Going through my hard drive, I found this article I wrote back in 2006, before I even thought of writing a blog.

Here it is for your delectation.

My father was a civil engineer in Nigeria. When the coup d'etat happened in 1983 his employer made him an offer – stay on with the company, and he'd get citizenship in any country he wanted. He chose to come to Sri Lanka and work here. For almost 23 years after his arrival he never worked in the engineering field.

Fast-forward from 1983 to 1999, I too chose to leave the US and come back to Sri Lanka. If I had so chosen I could have stayed there. I too, inspired by my father's example decided that I would help my country and returned.

I often wonder what things would have been like if we had not done so.

For better or worse both my father and I had a dream, that one day we would be able to make a difference in Sri Lanka, that the things we do would help make this country a better place. Dreams die hard under the harsh glare of reality, but die they do. And the more important that dream is to you, the more it hurts when you finally let it go.

The final nail was hammered into the coffin that houses what remains of our dreams a few weeks ago. We have a plot of land by the Bolgoda Lake. We have had that plot since 1980. In 2002 we applied for planning permission to build a wall in front of it, instead of the easily bypassed barbed-wire fence. It took almost a year for permission to be granted for a fence instead of a wall, because that is what the law allowed. Meanwhile, on both sides of our land, walls were being put up with impunity.

We finally started building the fence a month ago, only to have petitions brought against us. There was a lady in the authority who felt that we had enough of a case to fight the petitions, and helped us do so. She also made it plain that she wanted her pound of flesh. The dream died when my father finally gave in and paid her.

My father is an honourable man. He doesn't take bribes and he doesn't give them. When he finally decided to pay the woman, it was the end of his belief that if you are in the right, you don't have to worry about the law.

I admit that I am not as naïve as my father is. I have passed a folded note or two into the waiting hand of a policeman. I have applied what is euphemistically referred to in China as hyeung yao or "fragrant grease" when the wheels of bureaucracy seem to stall at the axle. Yet I firmly believed that this was not what the people wanted. That people were giving bribes because it was demanded, not because they wanted to. I honestly thought that under the right impetus you could actually get rid of the bribery and corruption.

Looking back, my naivete amazes me.

A bribe is not about money any more. It is the exchange of power and privilege for money. "Privilege" - now there is a word that has no ambiguity of meaning. Take the Latin roots of the word privus and legis, private and law. Your own personal law.

Bribery affects those who bribe as well as those who do not bribe. When the de facto rule is to bribe, then even the honest people who have no reason or wish to bribe, end up having to pass "a little something", a "small support", a "summa santhosam", a "podi udavva" to get what they want done. The people holding out their hands range from the beggar on the street who threatens to embarrass you if you don't give him something, to the garbage man who now expects a payment every month, all the way to the top.

The problem is like smoking. The first fag (and I mean a cigarette here) is the hardest one. Your head spins, your lungs burn, your body and mind rebels at this unnatural deed. Fast-forward a bit - you light up and take a drag and not only does nothing untoward happen, but you actually enjoy the sensation!

And people like it this way. A politician is not chosen on his abilities, but on "what can he do for us?" Can this man get my kid into a school? If I serve him will I get that fat contract? If I run around with his thugs, will I be able to get a few crumbs that fall from his table?

Unfortunately the entire nation is corrupt. The politicians bribe the people with promises of free this and free that to get them to vote. The politicians bribe the public servants with offers of more money in the form of salaries to make sure that things happen the way they want them to. The people bribe the politicians and the public servants directly or indirectly in order to get what they want. Everyone is bribing everyone else.

Near my home there was a housing complex being built. This was not your average complex, this was serious business. Immediately the politicians in the area were up in arms about it. The ecological and social integrity of the area was suddenly the most important thing in the world. The screaming, the shouting, the posturing and the postering was a sight to be seen. Yet this was as standard and ritualised an event as combing your hair and checking your fly before you ask a girl to dance. The performance was masterful, and the audience was appreciative. The money was paid, the construction went on.

The war goes on in the North. Many thousands die, many millions suffer. The ones who give the military contracts teach their children in international schools, send them abroad for their studies. All on a government servant's salary.

We used to have leaders of integrity in this nation. People used to be ashamed to give or take a bribe. This too has passed.

The problem is, like I said before, people actually enjoy giving bribes. It actually gives you a good feeling, that you can do something that the other guy can't or hasn't thought of yet. That you're actually getting away with doing something that you know is wrong. Its a rush, a high.

And there's the rub. Sri Lanka is, pardon my French, fucked. "Sri Lanka Matha" is the victim of a brutal gang rape. Her mind gone, her spirit broken, she sells herself on the street for a few rupees a shot. And she was made that way by the society that depends on her. The politicians sell her to anyone they can as long as they can get a cut for pimping her. Many of her illustrious, and not so illustrious, offspring are willing to sabotage any attempt to revive and rehabilitate her in exchange for a mess of pottage.

There is no honesty left here. No honour. Those concepts are dead. Dead like my father's dream of living in a society where if you did things right you could actually go forward and succeed.

What works here is money. Remember Al Pacino in Scarface? First, you get de money. When you get de money, den you get de power. When you get de money and de power, den you get de women.

Power is cheap in Sri Lanka. A few hundred bucks gets your trash hauled for a month. A few thousand and you don't have to go to court and face charges for drunken driving. Society as a whole is corrupt and likes it that way.

Many of us came back thinking we can help this country. That we can clean it up. I, for one, found that you can't clean what everyone wants to keep dirty. You can't free someone who keeps his chains on himself. You can't carry out an "intervention" in an addict's life when all he wants to do is see the pretty colours.

I'm here, still fighting. I run a small company and spend my time doing what is essentially volunteer work. What money I get comes from teaching. I make less than one tenth of what my friends who are in the same field make.

Even I can see the writing on the wall. Even if I try to ignore it, it's still there. Sri Lanka doesn't want to be saved. We the, dare I say, "intelligentsia" of this country don't have a hope. We come in with great dreams, and sooner or later we watch them get thrown in a pauper's grave.

Lets face it, the Sri Lanka we dream of is dead. The priests are performing the last rites, all we are doing is performing CPR on a corpse. Time to give her up. Time to walk away. Time to let our dreams die with dignity.

 

An Everlasting Emergency

Rant

So The Beast walks into Parliament and announces that he is repealing the Emergency Law. Well, not so much "repealing" as much as "not renewing it."

But anyway.. YAY! Loud Cheers!! And the clinking of glasses.

But it was all oddly subdued. Very oddly.

Because - just like everything else this government has done - it was just an eyewash.

The Beast said in his speech that during the Emergency declared by him and his brothers, there was no censorship of the press/media. How wonderful. How unique. How true. How TOTALLY FUCKING INACCURATE!

Who needs government censorship when any reporter who didn't toe the official line was threatened with death, attacked or "disappeared", or simply killed.

So.. Anyway..

The Emergency Act will not be renewed. How awesome. But the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) will still remain in force.

The PTA which already allows for 90% of what was allowed under the Emergency Laws. The PTA which is being "strengthened" with more legislation that will basically erase any difference between it and the Emergency Act. Well, any difference except one - you don't have to vote to extend the PTA every month.

So, we are being fed a nice, sugar-coated line of bullshit.

We are told to be happy that the Emergency Act is repealed. When all that is happening is that it is getting a revamp, and a booster shot of steroids so that we have it indefinitely, but under another name.

But we're told to be happy. That's a good thing isn't it?

Tuesday, July 05, 2011

The New Hotness

Rave

Everyone's talking about the new hotness. Google+ walked in the door, threw its hat in the ring, and proceeded to do to Facebook - the reigning champion - what FB did to the previous champions MySpace and Hi5.

All of a sudden the game changed. Everyone is raving about G+, and everyone wants in on the ground floor.

I was a (relative) latecomer to the game. Despite all my self-proclaimed geek cred, YT didn't get an invite until Day 3. But watching the way things are developing is an education in and of itself.

Google+ - if you didn't know by now - is a social media system created by Google to go head to head with Facebook. But the important bits are not in the "what" but in the "why" and "how."

Let's start with the "why." El GOOG was getting solidly trounced in the social media market. In an industry that is run on statistics, customer data, and demographics; where business wants to know more about their consumers than ever before, Facebook was the data-mining resource do jour.

GOOG knew what people were searching for, and they could target their advertising to the right people, but FB was the new hotness. The new kid in town was getting all the hot press. Facebook was becoming the place to work, not the Google Campus. They even made a fricken' movie about FB. To all intents and purposes, Facebook was king of the hill, and GOOG - for all its profitability - was on its way down.

GOOG launched and then quietly pulled the plug on Wave, Google Video (when it bought Youtube), and at least a few others (YT is too lazy to get a comprehensive list, maybe you can search for them on google). But, I guess that is the point of innovation isn't it? GOOG kept on innovating, trying to find the tools that would make it all-powerful, while FB remained a one trick pony. They made minor interface changes and added a few things and got rid of others, but all the real "development" was happening in the third-party apps - some benevolent, most malevolent - created for it.

Taking the initiative to innovate, and not being afraid of making mistakes, meant that GOOG could work at becoming more than they were.

And GOOG knows how to market G+. They took the same approach they took with GMail. Give out limited numbers of invites to a select group of early innovators, and watch the demand rise. At the start GMail invites were being sold on E-bay for as high as USD200 per invitation. I got mine (free, from a friend) when the E-bay price was at USD50 or so. When G+ invites came out they did the same thing. They created a high-tech club, where you had to know someone on the inside to get past the velvet rope.

Of course there is the other advantage to GOOG of all this. In GMail, as in G+, they tracked the spread of the invitations. You would have to be extremely naïve to think that GOOG didn't have the resources and the algorithms in place to track the spread of the invitations. Keeping track of the social connections between people - even before FB existed - was something GOOG was good at. And despite Facebook's launch in February 2004, it was limited only to Harvard University, and Mark Zuckerberg didn't have or need the ability to track the spread of the - for want of a better word - infection. GOOG had means, motive, and opportunity.

GOOG did the same thing with G+. Although they didn't really need to. The whole purpose of G+ was to keep track of peoples' social connections. If they didn't track the spread of the invitations, I will eat my hatcap; with the badges, hold the salt. The launch also generated enough of a buzz that G+ invitations started appearing on E-bay albeit at prices of less than USD20.

One of the reasons for the buzz is that the newsmedia missed out on the Facebook launch. When FB launched in February 2004, it was just a tiny little spark. No-one thought it would become the conflagration it is today. So when they get the chance of watching a social media revolution from the start, the jumped at the chnce. Also when a behemoth like GOOG announces that it is going to launch the Facebook-killer, the media starts fighting for front-row seats for the clash of the titans.

This is also part of the reason that users are clamouring to get into G+. Almost all of us - unless we were in Harvard in 2004 - missed out on the FB launch. People have a built-in desire to get in on the ground floor. To be seen as trendy or better yet, trend-setting. And with the launch of the "Facebook Killer" there are many people who want to be in on it.

Personally, I think that G+ is definitely the Next Big Thing™ in the social media field. Facebook went from being a social tool to being a marketing tool. People were getting tired of the targeted advertising, and the lack of privacy controls. G+'s solution is more intuitive. With the "Circles" concept as a way of controlling your social circles - taken from the open-source FB alternative Diaspora* - and extremely granular profile privacy settings.

MySpace went from being a social media tool to a way for musicians to market to each other. Facebook went from being a social media platform to being a way for companies to market to people. With the ability to create product pages and other marketing gimmicks FB - at least as far as YT was concerned - was going too far to cater to the marketers.

Of course this is bound to happen with any system. People have to eat, and get paid. But GOOG has a lot more experience in doing their marketing more subtly, as opposed to the heavy-handed methods used by FB. Which gives rise to the question "is ass-rape ok if they use lube and kiss you first?"

Because let us not forget - GOOG is not a search engine company. It is an advertising company. Its main business is figuring out what you want so that they can target their advertisements to you better. G+ is an attempt to not just get this information, but also allay the privacy fears that have plagued FB of late while collecting that same information. In a way what may make G+ work better than FB is that GOOG has a record of not sharing their data with third parties, while FB allows even the most basic app all kinds of access to your data.

I will not lie. I am excited by Google+. I think it has great potential. I am glad that the lessons El GOOG learned from its failures are being used to advance this tech. There are elements from Wave and many other "failed" services here.

But most of all, I am glad that in Google+ we now have an alternative to Facebook. Not just an alternative, but a solid competitor. This has shaken Facebook out of its complacency and even they are fighting to keep their position. Among the people who will benefit from this are us.

And that is not a bad thing.

Monday, April 18, 2011

Wanted: A Place To Hang My Hat

Muse

A long, very long, time ago we moved into The Linux Center. And now the time has come for us to move out.

This could be the end of TLC as we planned it, and as we know it. Originally we planned this house as a location where the Linux geeks of Sri Lanka could learn, meet, and pretty much have a place to call a geekbase.

That didn't quite work out the way we planned. But it was a good run nonetheless.

I guess it is time for me to move on.

So I am looking for a place to live. A bedsit/studio or maybe even 1 bedroom pad on the High Level or Galle Road, with a separate entrance, and an attached bathroom and preferably kitchen.

Unfortunately I am not rich, and can't afford to pay much.

If you have a place that can suit, or know of a place, please get in touch with me at suchetha@gmail.com, or call me on +94 (0) 716710369.

Even if you don't know of a place, wish me luck eh?